As far as not acknowledging the facts goes, I guess the folks I saw do this over the past two weeks are liberals: say that lowering taxes raises revenues (always), that Sarah Palin and George W. Bush are intelligent (and that Glenn Beck makes some good points), that people will choose to pay higher taxes given two options, that there are two sides to the evolution “debate”, that even if global warming is as bad as predicted, the consequences that will last over millennia are lower than the cost of reducing emissions over the next century, that the stock market inevitably declines when it appears that the Democrats will get their way, that Banquo's Ghosts is a real page-turner, that it's remotely possible that a federal anti-gay-marriage amendment could ever be ratified, that Obama will likely abolish the dollar in lieu of a global currency, and that he will also create reeducation camps for our youth, that Norm Coleman has any possible recourse in either the MN or US Supreme Courts, that ACORN is something to fear, that George Soros singlehandedly brought down the economy for his own benefit, that a secretive liberal cabal utilizes and e-mail list to set the national liberal agenda… these are all positions taken by mainstream Republicans in Congress, on broadcast television and radio, and in the pages of the journals of the conservative intelligentsia.

But yes, you're right that it's a bit of denial to claim that Obama didn't bow, or that Bush did precisely the same as Obama. However, I said “bowing to Abdullah as he's given a medal,” which is entirely accurate.

Along with the submissive bow is that $900 Million going to Gaza and Hamas. You question his priorities? Still?

If you could make an argument as to how Obama's bow is less ridiculous than Bush's Saudi sword dance, have at it – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g4bC_QA2HOo